|
|
||
|
Home | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Workshop | BoloKids | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact | Share This Page Shop Online |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Opinion
Why are we bending over backwards to accommodate our ‘friendly’ neighbors? It is okay to be peace loving, and that’s what sets us apart from them, but to be magnanimous to the extent that we have been with them and consistently overlook the harm that our country has been subjected to, is not only foolish, but is also a crime against our own people, especially those who laid down their lives in wars and terrorist attacks. We need to take stock, sit back and think rationally as to what we are gaining from associating ourselves with Pakistan. I am aware that champions of ‘peace process’ would argue that India is gaining a lot from this alliance, in that there will be a let up in cross-border terrorism and Pakistan will round up the culprits on their side of the border. It’s been a few years since mutual dialogue was established and the ‘peace process’ was initiated. May I ask, apart from uniting a few long lost relatives in the two countries, has it brought about any reduction in terrorist activities since then? If anything, it’s quite the opposite. Terrorists are striking at will at some of our most dear and strategic public places. Pakistan may vehemently deny any involvement in these attacks, but there is no doubt as to the source of these terrorists, their machinations or indeed ammunitions. Doubtless, not the whole of Pakistani society is involved in subversive activities. They may be largely peace loving like we are and I am not pointing fingers at all of them. Besides, there are bad apples in our basket too. But at the same time Pakistan has undeniably harbored terror camps on its soil. Even if we agree that there may be militant groups operating covertly across the border, which the Pakistani Government may not be controlling, what have they done to curb their growth and root them out? They are not even ready to accept that there are terrorist groups operating from their country, let alone control them. It is time for a radical shift in our foreign policy. Akin to Gandhiji’s non-co-operation movement, I propose a policy of total non-involvement with Pakistan. Please bear with me while I attempt to justify this and consider the following issues. Political differences We take pride in our democratic system and secularism, with representation of all classes and people of diverse faith. On the other hand, Pakistan has always been prone to a theocratic and sometimes autocratic military regime over the years. Religion is at the core of all the state policies. But then again, what else can be expected from a country, which took its birth based on religious reasons? Do they deserve the kind of attention that we are showering on them, especially after they decided to separate themselves from us some 60 years ago? Differences in economic progress
We have made rapid strides economically and continue to scale new
heights in the global scenario. Pakistan’s economy, on the other hand,
is in the doldrums. If the ongoing ‘peace process’ would result in us
bailing them out of their financial humdrum, then what can be better for
them? It seems in their quest for economic one-upmanship, they need to
have everything we do, be it nuclear technology or information
technology.
We are a secular state represented by various faiths, religions, castes
and tribes living harmoniously, save an occasional aberration. Yet
others, including Pakistan point fingers towards us whenever there is a
minority related issue. Such people should be referred to the fact that
right now, an Italian leader of the ruling party, a Sikh Prime Minister
and a Muslim President, are representing India. Minority communities in
India have excelled in every sphere, be it politics, films, or sports.
Actor Feroz Khan was right in saying, much to the chagrin of the
Pakistanis, that generally Muslims in India lead a much better life than
those across the border.
It is perhaps naïve to bring in films here, but films are considered to
be great socio-cultural unifiers. But our films are banned in their
country mainly because their pedestrian film industry will disappear
into oblivion if their films have to compete with ours. However the
reason they are stating is that our films showcase a different culture,
which is rather bold for their tastes. Now, suddenly our cultures are
different! Yet the Pakistanis perhaps watch more Hindi movies than we
all do put together. They watch them one way or the other. And it is
usually the other way. I am talking here about the cross-border piracy.
Half of the problem of piracy plaguing our film industry will be
resolved if we can curtail cross-border piracy, which seems to have
become a viable industry in itself! And nobody seems to be bothered.
Be it Al-Qaeda, Taliban, LeT, JeM, Bin Laden, Abu Salem, Dawood Ibrahim,
or others, the common theme for all of them is terrorism. Along with the
West, India has also borne the brunt of this theme partly because we are
a non-Islamic state and mainly because we are a soft target due to our
policies. All of them have created havoc in our Country to various
extents and all have some connection or the other with our neighbour.
Their overall agenda is to divert our attention from Nation building,
from our attempts to promote religious harmony and to undermine the
ongoing economic progress. And we, with our ‘please all’ policies and
lenient approach, are playing into their hands perfectly. Pakistan will never ever aid India sincerely in weeding out terrorism from our soil. Alone or in partnership. The concept of partnering Pakistan in investigating terrorism in India defies all logic. It is like asking Bin Laden to chair a panel looking into the 9/11 attacks! For them to even consider helping us, they need to acknowledge that the source of terrorism in our Country is indeed from their soil. Despite evidence to suggest the existence of a culture of terrorism in their country, Musharraf & co have steadfastly denied it. In fact, as a classic example of projective identification (a psychological defence mechanism), they are now alleging that we have instigated the Baluchistan movement. Yet we go to them, brushing every issue under the carpet, extending an olive branch, asking them to help us, when we really should be looking to blank their presence from our soil. Other neighbors
Unfortunately there are also other nations around us, which are
knowingly or unknowingly abetting terrorism. We know for a fact that
terrorists from Pakistan have traversed through Nepal on a few
occasions. And our great eastern neighbor, Bangladesh is covertly
exporting multitudes of its people across the porous border, whilst
breeding radicalism on its own land. It is only the geographical
distance that has prevented terrorists from Pakistan and Bangladesh from
forging an alliance against us. When we have so many issues to sort out
with these countries, not to mention the border disputes with China and
the Tamil conundrum in Sri Lanka, why are we focusing our attention
almost exclusively on Pakistan?
Living in the UK these days, is like living in a nation that is at war.
With an invisible enemy. So called ‘British’ Muslims, born and bred in
the UK, educated and financially well to do, are turning to radical
ideology like never before. Their excuse for resorting to terrorism is
that their brethren, be it in Kashmir, Afghanistan or Iraq are being
persecuted by non-Islamic states. If educated youths can take recourse
to terrorism with a warped sense of judgement, consider what the easily
brain-washable, illiterate, jobless Pakistani youths would do. Why do
these educated youths continue to live a life of luxury in western
countries when they really should be out there fighting for their ‘kith
and kin?’ Elsewhere, we have already witnessed the 9/11 events, Madrid
and Bali bombings, to name a few. And guess where most of these attacks
and plots can be traced back to? Correct, Pakistan! Our partner in the
fight against terrorism!
Just because we have inked a nuclear deal with America, it would be
childish to assume that America will back us in our fight against terror
originating from Pakistan. Despite knowing very well that cross-border
terrorism is a distinct reality, Bush has always taken Mush’s side and
patted him on the back. After all, America has only its own
interest at heart and would have to back Pakistan if it is to gain
access to Afghanistan or indeed if it is to nab Bin Laden. This is where
we stand alone.
I cannot over-emphasize the fact that we have more than enough problems
on our plate to be importing some more from Pakistan. Over-population,
poverty, illiteracy, corruption, lack of civic sense and deterioration
in law and order are still ailing us, even in these days of economic
betterment. Again, instead of tackling these issues, we have ended up
giving undue importance to building relations with our unruly neighbor.
How many more Kargils need to be waged before we open our eyes? How long
can the Kashmir imbroglio be allowed to fester? How many more places of
National importance should be attacked before we act? And above all, how
many more ordinary, innocent people should lose their lives before we
wake up to the situation? After all, it is always the common man
who is most affected, whilst the ministers from either side continue
their ‘dialogue’ in plush venues.
A white elephant is described by the online dictionary as ‘a
possession entailing great expense out of proportion to its usefulness
or value to the owner.’ Unfortunately that’s what Kashmir has become
for us. Purists may cry foul and say that Kashmir is dear to us and is
an integral part of India, but we cannot ignore the fact that we have
expended unimaginable amount of time, finances, energy and above all
human lives in keeping this possession since independence. And in the
process we have completely diverted our attention from Nation building
towards fire fighting in Kashmir. After all this, have we succeeded in
warding off the insurgents from across the border? No! Over the years,
thanks to the proxy war waged by Pakistan, the northwestern part of the
state has been completely eroded by the virus of terror. This virus is
still multiplying and expanding. People living in POK call themselves
citizens of ‘Azad Kashmir.’ Well, if ‘azadi’ is what they want, then
that’s what we should be giving them. October 8, 2006 The Week of October 8, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home | Bolography | BoloKids | Columns | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Quotes | Workshop | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact |
|
|