|
|
Opinion
Amarnath Row: A Test for Kashmir's Syncretic Culture
by Amulya Ganguli
Governments in India seem to believe in acting in haste, or without much
forethought, and then pay the price later. The upsurge in Jammu and Kashmir
could have been avoided if the fateful step of expanding the operations of
the Amarnath shrine board and then rescinding the order had been preceded by
the kind of wider consultations now being held by the centre.
Such care was all the more necessary in a state as sensitive and volatile as
Jammu and Kashmir. It isn't only that Pakistan's notorious Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) agency has long been engaged in fomenting terrorism there
and elsewhere in India, the presence of secessionist elements in the valley
also means that communal relations have to be carefully nurtured.
It is a tribute to the innate strength of Kashmir's syncretic culture that
Hindu-Muslim ties have remained largely unaffected by the present
disturbances, which have had both Srinagar and parts of the Jammu region in
their violent grip for days on end.
Arguably, the ordinary people have recognized the unholy intentions of both
the separatists in the valley and the parochial Hindutva groups in Jammu.
They are apparently not unaware that these outfits are more interested in
advancing their own partisan causes than in promoting the interests of the
state as a whole.
The origin of the dispute is also not unrelated to saffron machinations.
What is noteworthy is that the presence of the then governor, S.K. Sinha,
known for his pro-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) sympathies, had complicated
the situation when the decision was taken to transfer nearly 100 acres of
forest land to the Amarnath board for the construction of facilities for
pilgrims.
However, the state government's culpability for the injudicious step is no
less. It should have anticipated that the move would be resented by sections
of Muslims in the valley since they have traditionally been associated with
the welfare of the Hindu pilgrims ever since a wandering shepherd, Buta
Malik, discovered the cave with the ice lingam, the Hindu holy emblem, at
the height of 12,760 feet in 1850.
Since then, Malik's s descendants have acted as custodians of the cave and
received a percentage of donations from the pilgrims. But what this
association signified was the age-old bond between the Hindus and Muslims in
Kashmir.
That bond was in danger of being badly strained as the pro-Pakistani and
secessionist outfits saw an opportunity to utilize the resentment in the
valley to launch violent protests while usual suspects like Yasin Malik lost
no time to jump into the fray with fast-unto-death threats. The waning
influence of the fundamentalists must have also persuaded them to grab the
chance to create trouble in order to boost their prospects.
Their protests inevitably sparked off similar outbreaks in Jammu where the
saffron brotherhood realized that the controversy has given it a readymade
issue to exploit. For the BJP, the Amarnath shrine issue, like the Ram Sethu
controversy, is a godsend on the eve of the forthcoming round of state
assembly elections since it enables the party to play the Hindu card -
something it has been unable to do ever since it put the Ram temple issue on
the backburner.
Not surprisingly, the BJP has been threatening a nationwide agitation in
spite of the centre's admittedly belated attempts to defuse the situation by
holding wide-ranging talks. It evidently wants to take the issue outside of
Jammu as well with an eye on the polls, including the general election later
this year or early in the next.
The centre's response, as may have been expected, has been tardy and
unimaginative. The expiry of Sinha's gubernatorial term enabled it to put
its own man, N.N. Vohra, in Raj Bhavan, and the latter's first act was to
revoke the earlier order. But not only did it fail to satisfy the protesters
in Srinagar, it also focused the ire of the Jammu agitators on the new
governor.
The shrine board itself was set up following the Nitish Sengupta committee's
report in 1996 on the deaths of 200 pilgrims because of bad weather. The
need to upgrade the existing facilities was evidently felt to be beyond the
capacity of the then caretakers.
The state government has now decided to step into the picture after taking
over the land from the board. But having first bungled by handing over the
forest tracts to the board, its claims about improving the facilities do not
seem credible.
The all-party meeting organized by the centre may help to calm tempers to an
extent, but whether the political elements in the two regions of the state
will be responsible enough to tone down their rhetoric and let peace prevail
is open to question.
There are some signs of hope as the restrictions on the movement of goods to
the valley through Punjab and Jammu are being eased by the agitators. There
is also the possibility of the centre accepting the BJP's demand that it
hold talks with the Sri Amarnath Sangharsh Samity, which is spearheading the
agitation.
But the problem is to find a solution acceptable to all. One suggestion has
been to reconstitute the board with a larger percentage of local, especially
Muslim, representation. Even if it is accepted by the Sangharsh Samity,
whether the tension in the valley will be defused if the board again takes
over the land cannot be said for certain.
(Amulya Ganguli is a political analyst. He can be reached at aganguli@mail.com)
August 9, 2008
Top
|
Opinion
|
|
