The Indian Prime Minister,
Dr Manmohan Singh has just returned from an official three day visit to
China from January 15-18, 2008. On his return to India the spin-masters
of the Indian policy establishment got busy giving unwarranted spins to
a visit that brought no forward movement in India-China relations and
especially the most controversial issue of the boundary settlement.
Every time China and India exchange high level political visits the
references to the settlement of the border dispute are cloaked in
worn-out clichés that both leaders have expressed their determination to
reach a settlement of the border dispute by putting into effect
mechanisms to accelerate the dialogue and raising the level of
discussions.
The present visit of the Indian Prime Minister to China this month was
no exception and similar rhetorical outpourings followed in official
statements. The China lobby within India and in the think tanks would
like Indians to believe that the Chinese style of negotiations on
complex issues is painstaking and therefore slow. Therefore from China
one can expect only incremental forward movement in changes in China’s
foreign policy formulations and attitudes toward India. If that be so
then why do Indian political leaders become so voluble in painting rosy
pictures of their official exchanges with Chinese leaders when the
latter mare more reticent in their assertions on this issue. And the
second most important point is whether India is content with incremental
changes in China’s policies and not resort to exploration of alternative
options which are available.
In my Column of August 4,
2007 entitled “China Re-asserts Antagonistic Postures
Towards India” the following major observations were made:
- China’s needling and
antagonistic postures against India (and these were outlined) were
being pursued in tandem with rhetorical assertions of China’s
sincere desire for friendship with India and settlement of
outstanding issues.
- The China lobby in
India was making much of the new approaches initiated by China in
its India policies.
- China stands rattled
by the enhancement of India’s strategic profile in the global
strategic calculus and views in this an inherent possibility of an
impediment in China’s quest for challenging the established
status-quo of the global strategic power equations.
- China’s latest
manifestations of antagonistic postures towards India can be read as
arising from the intensification of the US-India Strategic
Partnership.
- India should
consequently expect that China would linger on the boundary
settlement with India and use it as a strategic pressure-point
against India along with its India containment policies.
A reality check of the
present state of China- India relations against the backdrop of the
above would indicate the following :
- Despite many
assertions on the boundary issue China continues to refuse to
exchange maps with India on their boundary alignment.
- India is every time
told that the framework and the guiding principles have to be first
formulated as if to say that more than a decade which has passed was
not enough when the first discussions on these aspects were first
touched upon
- Recent reports from
Indian official circles indicate that Chinese troops made more than
300 incursions into Indian Territory in the last two years.
- Chinese troops
demolished Indian bunkers in the vicinity of the junction of
India-Bhutan border.
- Chinese academics
have begun forcefully reiterating that China-India boundary
settlement is not possible until India agrees to compromise by
handing over Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh in India to China.
To the above list needs to
be added that China still continues to be ambivalent and is not explicit
in asserting that it would not oppose India’s Permanent Membership of
the UN Security Council and that it would not oppose the passage of the
India –US Nuclear Deal in the Nuclear Suppliers Group negotiations. The
latter has been commented as such by the Indian Prime Minister on his
return from China that he could not get any firm guarantees from China
on that score.
China has also not given any indications that it is now inclined to
recast its South Asia policies that impinge on India’s strategic
sensitivities and pose a threat to India’s national security interests
with special reference to its nexus with Pakistan
Overall, the present picture of China-India relations is neither
promising nor optimistic as sought to be made out by most Indian
strategic analysts. It is forgotten by them that with India’s growing
strategic salience in global affairs and India’s strategic and military
buildup, China –India relations are no longer a one-way street. China
needs to recognize that any future Chinese foreign policy formulations
must take this into account.
Concluding one would like to emphasize that India should strive to forge
a friendly and co-operative relationship with India but at the same time
keeping its strategic guard against China in a high state of vigilance
and alertness.
India’s political leadership, its policy establishment and its strategic
community should not be overtaken by romanticism generated by China’s
rhetorical flourishes and in the process become oblivious to the lessons
of the history of China-India relations and the strategic vagaries
therein.
January 18,
2008
Top |
PlainSpeak