Society
	Doctors Do Discriminate, Say HIV-Pregnant Women
		
	
	“At the time of my delivery, I faced  				discrimination from my doctor. She abused me and asked in a very  				derogatory manner why I had got pregnant. Finally, she refused  				to do the delivery,” shared Asha, an HIV-positive women from  				Karnataka, in a 2009 advocacy video produced by the National  				AIDS Control Organization (NACO); Ministry of Labor and  				Employment; and the International Labor Organization (ILO).
Unfortunately, Asha’s painful brush with discrimination is not a  				solitary instance. At a recent HIV/AIDS training session in New  				Delhi for medical doctors, on exploring attitudes, I observed  				how deep-seated an informed doctor’s negative attitudes can  				truly be.
For that session, a person living with HIV had been invited to  				join in the discussion. The group had not been informed of his  				status in advance. After a while of sitting in the discussion  				circle, the gentleman shared his life before and after the HIV  				infection and concluded that he was leading a healthy and  				productive life for over 10 years from when his HIV status had  				been detected. It was then that a lady doctor, who sat right  				next to him in the circle, made her dislike quite obvious. On  				learning of his status, her expression changed. She first turned  				her face in the other direction, and then started to slowly inch  				her chair away from him. Finally, she got up and moved to sit on  				another chair at a fair distance from him. It is not difficult  				to foresee how she would respond when asked to attend a delivery  				for an HIV-positive mother. I recalled what Asha had shared with  				me about her experience with a healthcare provider. 
In an ILO study (2002) on the extent of stigma and  				discrimination in India, nearly 34 per cent of the HIV-positive  				people interviewed had mentioned that they had faced stigma and  				discrimination in healthcare settings. Refusal to attend to  				HIV-positive pregnant women and to conduct deliveries; refusal  				to give injections, food and to change bed sheets; and refusal  				to do surgery were some common forms of discrimination faced by  				HIV-positive people at the hands of healthcare providers.
Discrimination always hurts but it hurts most when it comes from  				healthcare settings because people who go to hospitals are  				already in physical distress or pain.
We have been living in the age of AIDS for the last three  				decades. We have learnt that seeing HIV from a moralistic lens  				has not helped. HIV prevention programs will succeed if people  				living with HIV are not discriminated against. Reducing  				HIV-related discrimination, therefore, is a prevention strategy.  				In this direction, we still have a long way to go.
The recently published UNAIDS-WHO AIDS Epidemic Update 2009  				presents a good mix of positive trends as well as challenges.  				New HIV infections have been reduced by 17 per cent over the  				past eight years. However, new infections in some countries  				continue to rise. The number of AIDS-related deaths has declined  				by over 10 per cent in the past five years, largely because  				access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) is getting better, and  				people are able to live longer. Treatment to HIV-positive  				pregnant mothers has resulted in preventing around 2,00,000 new  				infections globally among children since 2001.
However, universal access to treatment will remain elusive until  				discrimination in healthcare settings reduces. While policies  				and legislations are useful they are not enough in themselves.  				Attitudes need to change and this requires a well-planned and  				coordinated training effort for healthcare providers. It may  				take time to cover all in a big country like India but an effort  				must be made. And the earlier the better. After all, the AIDS  				story is about people - men, women and children.
In an ILO-supported project amongst migrant construction workers  				in Maharashtra, I met two young sisters in 2009. They had  				migrated from Uttar Pradesh to Mumbai after their respective  				marriages to two brothers, who worked as construction workers.  				Both of them were AIDS widows and living with HIV. “My husband  				died of AIDS in 2002. I have two children; one of them is also  				HIV-positive. I need work to support my children. I want to  				educate them as much as I can,” shared the elder sister.  				However, while the other sister had similar dreams she knew that  				rejection would be part of her life: “After my husband’s death,  				I started working in a women’s hostel as a cook. My supervisor  				came to know of my status and sacked me.”
The main needs of people living with HIV are broadly: An end to  				HIV-related stigma and discrimination; access to available  				treatment; and access to regular work that would translate into  				income. All these three requirements need our complete attention  				and focus. World AIDS Day is a time to renew our commitment to  				work on these issues. The solution, which does not lie with the  				health ministry alone, calls for a multi-sectoral response. 				
The AIDS epidemic report brings out an important lesson: The  				impact of the programme is high where HIV-prevention and  				treatment programs are integrated with other health and social  				welfare services. This integration may take a while but it is  				the right thing to do.
I appeal to my medical doctor friends to not turn your face away  				from people living with HIV: Only you are equipped to give them  				that healing touch.
(The writer is ILO Technical Specialist (HIV/AIDS), South Asia.  				The views expressed in this article are his own.) 				
	
	01-Dec-2009
	More by : 
		 S. Mohammad Afsar					
		
		
	 
	
		 Top  | Society
	
	
	
	
			
		 
                
                |   | Dear sir/madam 
 My sister pregnant for eight month & she is infected for hiv possitve. plz tell me where  to treat  her in delhi/ncr.
 
 |  |