History

Striking Similarity

Between Harappan and Vedic Weight Measures

Indus people have used exceptionally developed units of measurement. They have even used binary and decimal methods of counting.

In the Magnum Opus on Indus Civilization published by John Marshal [1931] A. S. Hemmy wrote an extensive essay by the name ‘System of weight in Mohenjo Daro’. There Hemmy has shown that the weight items were not abrupt, rather interlinked [ .87 gm, 1.76 gm, 3.41 gm, 6.82 gm etc]. The same pattern was found at other excavated sites like Chanhudaro etc. From the evidences we can reach to the decision of the use of Binary [ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16…] and Decimal [10, 20, 50, 100 etc.] practices at Indus valley civilization.

According to Hemmy the smallest unit of weight measure was .87 gm and others were its multiples. A. R. Hall and J. M. Mackey opined that the basic unit was 13.65 gm. We can arrange them by three tables …

Table - 1

Multiple
of the
Smallest
Unit
1 2 4 8 16 32 64
Multiple
of the
13.65 gm
Unit
1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 1 2 4
Idealized
Weight
.87
gm
1.75
gm
3.45
gm
6.85
gm
13.65
gm
27.35
gm
54.65
gm

Table - 2
13.65 gm and larger weights found by factor of 10

X 10 X 20 X 40 X 12.5
136.5 gm 273.5 gm 546.5 gm 170.6 gm

Table - 3

13.65 gm larger by factors of 100

X 100 X 200 X 400 X 500 X 800
1.365 kg 2.73 kg 5.46 kg 6.83 kg 10.920kg

Clearly the weights were properly calculated. Though slight differences are found, that should have been the effect of natural decaying and/or natural addition of dust etc for more than 3000 years. The same weight items are found in Ur, Dilmun [ Bahrain] and Magan [Oman].

Vedic Veight System

Going through the Vedic system of weight and measurements we can get the following information.

1. Smallest unit = Ratti. It is actually opium seed [Abrus Precatorius] .
The seed is reddish. Actual name is Raktika.
Raktika > Ratti. Another name of it was Krishnal.

2. Another unit is Maasha or Maashaka.
Smallest unit of length was Angula.
Maashaka or maasha = mass of 1 cubic angula of water.

3. Other units are saana, pala, mushthi, karsha, suvarna, nishka etc

From Rigveda, Mahabharata, Charaka Sanhita, Astadhyayi and other Smriti texts we get chart of weight units and their relations –

To mesure GOLD To measure other than GOLD
10 ratti = 1 maasha 10 ratti = 1 maasha
4 maasha = 1 saana 3 maasha = 1 saana
4 saana = 16 maasha =
                  1 suvarna
4 saana = 1 karsha
16 saana = 64 maasha =
                  4 suvarna =
                  1 nishka
4 karsha = 16 saana =
                  1 pala/mushthi

In Manu Sanhita 5 ratti = 1 maasha for measuring gold is taken, thereby 80 ratti = 1 suvarna and 320 ratti comes to 1 nishka.

4. From Bhagabata Purana (for measuring the volumes of dry items) we get

I. Vreehi = dhaan or rice with husk
II. 4 vreehi = 1 gunja
III. 5 gunja = 1 pana [= 20 vreehi]
IV. 8 pana = 1 dharana [ = 160 vreehi or dhaan]
V. 8 dharana = 1 karsha [ = 1440 vreehi]
VI. 4 karsha = 1 pala [ = 5760 vreehi]
VII. 100 pala = 1 tula
VIII. 20 tula = 1 bhaar

To calculate the volume of dry materials Narada Purana has mentions

  1. 8 handful[anjali] = 1 kinchit
  2. 8 kinchit = 1 pushkala
  3. 4 pushkala = 1 andaka
  4. 4 andaka = 1 drona
  5. 20 drona = 1 kumbha [note 8]

Dongre [1] has valuated, 1 andaka = .2825 gm
To him 10 krishnala = 4 andaka = 1 maasha

He even has found a similar andaka unit in Heavy Assyrian System with the same value. There 60 andaka = 1 shekel = 16.8 gm. According to him in Light Babylinian System, 1 shekel = 30 andaka = 8.4 gm

To be precise, Arthashastra of Kautilya has referred silver coins by the name of pana, ardhapana, pada etc and copper coins by maashaka, ardha maashaka, kakini etc.

Panini referred karshapana or pana of 32 rattis. According to him 16 maasha = 1 karshapana; vimastika = 40 rattis, trimastika = 60 rattis, satamaana = 100 rattis, and saana = 12.5 rattis. Silver coin is of karshapana = 32 rattis, though several other weights were found. Weight of krishnala varies from 1.7 to 2.25 grains.

To the ancient Indians, a coin was not a piece of inanimate metal with an official stamp, but a form pulsating with symbols, names of kings, gods and goddesses portraying wealth and prosperity.

For a much probable study we will here mention some of the units used in India at least since Mauryan era. They are

  1. Krishnal/ratti [2] = weight of a gunja seed = .113 gm [1.83 grain]
  2. Karsha = 13.56 gm [note 4].
  3. Kaarshaapana = note 3, 5.
  4. Pana [4] = ‘pana’ means a handful’, derived from ‘paani’ [means the hand]. ‘pana’ was a copper coin of 80 ratti seeds.
  5. Maasha [1] = mass of 1 cubic ‘anguli (= 1.04167 cm)’ of water i.e. 1.13 gm [ = 10 ratti]
  6. Paada = 1/4th of ‘shatamaana’.
  7. Nishka = According to Sanskrit Dictionaries ( Apte, Monnier-Williams) cerebral na means an ornament or gift and Lord Siva. Nishka means either gold or an ornament of gold or a coin. It was [6] a golden coin at Buddha period, initially which was used in the form of an ornament. Its weight was 25 ‘dharana’, equivalent to 10 ounces in Buddha era. Its weight was different in Indus period. [72.3 gm]
  8. Saana = 3.3 gm
  9. Shatamana = 36.16 gm
  10. Bhaar = 8000 karsha = 2000 pala = 20 tula

In comparing Vedic weight and measure system with Indus system we can have a comparative table.

Hazra [1] and Dongre[2] separately had studied comparatively the weights found in Indus sites with Vedic measurements and compared the weights thereof with the weights found from Taxaila [Buddhist period] and Nevasa [post-Harappan] [5].

Purana is actually equivalent to karshapana, the name used in later Buddhist period. From his study we can find that the weight units of Chanhu-daro, Nevasa and Taxila (three different periods and cultures) have striking similarities.

Table 4

Weight
in gm
Canhudaro
(gm)
Nevasa
(gm)
Taxila
(gm)
1 purana = 32 ratti-s ** 3.616 3.6, 3.8
1 shatamana = 10 purana 32.16 36.89 35.96
2 shatamana = 1 nishka 72.3 60.93, 69.93 69.1 69.6
1 maasha = 5 ratti (for Gold) .56 .56 .59

** 1 purana = 1 saana = karshapana = 3.6 gm

Table – 5 [from Hazra [1], N.G.Dongre (2) and Mackey (3)]

Vedic Unit Vedic Weight
[gm] [2]
Indus Weight
[gm] [2] after
Marshall **
Indus Weight
[gm][3]***
Weights from
Nevasa (N) and
Taxila (T)
[gm] [1]
paadasaana .8475 .87 .88
saanaardha 1.695 1.76 1.63
1 maashaka
or maasha
1.13 1.14
(1.255)
2 maashaka 2.26 2.28
1 saana 3.3 3.41 3.40
1 drakshana 6.78 6.82 6.78 6.78 [N]
7.06 [T]
1 karsha
= 4 saana
= 16 maasha
13.56 13.65 13.51
Palardha
= 2 karsha
= 8 saana
27.12 27.38 27.14 27.10 [T]
1 pala/mushthi
= saana
54.24 54.23 54.13 54.82 [N]
53.45 [T]
40 saana
= 10 karsha
135.6 135.15 136.04
50 saana 169.5 170.6
5 mushthi
= 80 saana
271.2 272.9 273.59 284.3 [N]
10 mushthi
= 160 saana
542.4 546.5 544.77
25 mushthi
= 400 saana
= 100 karsha
1356 1365 1330.68
1 B.L. saana
           ****
3.03 2.95
1/3 B.L. saana .985 .980
2/3 B.L. saana 2.07 1.97
4/3 B.L. saana 3.94 3.92
8 B.L. saana 23.65 24.50
16 B.L. saana
= 1 B. mushthi
47.30 47.30

** weights taken by Dongre from Marshall (1931).
*** weights from Mackey (1943).
**** B L Saana = Bhaajani Lauha Saana [2]. This ancient measuring units and table are also found in Mohenjodaro.

From this table we can take that the basic unit of Indus weight as identified by Hall and Mackey i.e. 13.65 gm is equivalent to Vedic Karsha [one unit].

From Table 4 and 5, it is obvious that the same continuous weight system was practiced by the Indian merchants from Indus to Vedic period through the post-Harappan and Buddhist periods. The intermittent use of weights and measures was started in Indus civilization and carried by others without any break. From this study we can put the unit names, as found in Vedic and Buddhist literatures, to the Indus inscriptions to decipher them.

Probably this was identified with [Image] sign when precious items are to be weighted. This sign was used as letter ‘ka’ when used in a word and that very sign was used as unit ‘kumbha’, when volumes of items were to be mentioned.

Other weight units can also be identified by the valuations of letters identified in earlier articles. Saana, karsha, shatamana etc for weight measures and kumbha, bhaar etc for volumetric measures and 5, 10, 100 etc for counting are very much written in Indus inscriptions along with proper names and other information.

Notes:

  1. It is observed that several weight systems were there at Vedic period. Unit values were different for gold and silver/copper weights. Moreover, counting units for volumes of dry items were there. All these units were continued from Indus periods.
  2. Scholars like Jones, Princep, Canninghum, Kosambi, Altekar, Bhandarker etc had calculated the different weights for ratti seed. After much discussions 1.83 grain i.e. 0 .113 gm is accepted for it.
  3. Before Vimvishara of Magadha, kaarshapana was available by the name dharana/purana.
  4. ‘karsha’ means ploughing and agriculture which indicates hub of weight standard, monetary system and coinage.
  5. ‘kaarshaapana’ means ‘karsha’ + ‘aapana’(custom or use), which was ‘kahapana ’in Buddhist era, and ‘kahan’ later.
  6. ‘shatamaana’ of 1 pala = 576 grain.
  7. Silver karsha = 56 grain [3] = 3.6 gm
  8. From ‘kumbha’ sign ‘ka’ was derived both for letter and for unit of weight through Acrophony.

References:

  1. Hazra Shankar : ‘harappa nagare basati korinu’(I redided in Harappa City),1991
  2. Dongre  N G, ‘Metrology and Coinage in Ancient India and Contemporary World’, Indian Journal of History of Science, 29[3], 1994
  3. Mackey E. J. H. , ‘CHANHU-DARO EXCAVATIONS, 1935-36’, 1943
  4. Cunninghum  A , ‘Coins of Ancient India’, London, 1891
  5. Sankalia D A : ‘From History to Pre-history at Nevasa’
  6. Singh Dr A and Kumar A: ‘Monetary Economy in Buddha Period’, IOSR

01-Apr-2018

More by :  Rajat K Pal


Top | History

Views: 3531      Comments: 2



Comment to Mr. J King,
Sir,
Thank you for reading this article. the marginal differences occurred owing to decaying naturally for hundreds of years.

Rajat Pal
02-Nov-2023 00:29 AM

Comment I may have misread, but there is a small query on the data shown.
For Table 1 &2 &3 weights are built from a base of 13.65grams at 1/2; 1/4; 1/8; 1/16 & 2; 10; 20; 40; 12.5; 100; 200; 400; 500 & 800. From these there are ‘idealized weights’ which are fractionally adrift at the smaller values – perhaps by only showing 2 decimal places as 6.85; 3.45; 1.75; 0.87 rather than the more precisely calculated 6.825; 3.41; 1.70; 0.85 which give a 1 to 2.5% discrepancy.
Can you assist. Thanks

J King
30-Oct-2023 18:23 PM




Name *

Email ID

Comment *
 
 Characters
Verification Code*

Can't read? Reload

Please fill the above code for verification.