Demystifying Politics

Why should politicians be entitled to special privileges, while the average citizen must work tirelessly to earn the same? Can we truly say that political positions are about service when those in power enjoy perks far beyond what the general public has access to? And most critically, when did the very essence of public service turn into a glamorous profession fueled by taxpayer money? The time has come to critically assess the perks and privileges that politicians enjoy and consider whether they should be stripped of these luxuries in favor of a more accountable and equitable system.

The Culture of Glamour in Politics

India's political arena is rife with an aura of glamour, a sense of entitlement that often distorts the true purpose of governance. From lavish bungalows and free air travel to unrestricted telephone bills, the perks afforded to elected officials present a glaring contradiction to the notion of public service. These benefits, which include taxpayer-funded comforts, create a disparity between politicians and the citizens they represent.

While the masses struggle with rising costs of living and a lack of basic amenities, politicians appear insulated from the financial hardships experienced by ordinary people. Is this fair? Does this foster a sense of accountability, or does it breed complacency and corruption?

Public Service, Not Personal Gain

The fundamental role of a politician is to serve the people, not to elevate their own status. If we view political positions through the lens of service rather than privilege, it becomes evident that the culture of perks must be re-evaluated. A politician should not be entitled to privileges that create a sense of separation from the public they represent. When an individual enters politics to serve, their personal well-being should not be subsidized by the taxpayers, who themselves are often struggling to make ends meet.

By removing such entitlements, we can shift the focus from the material gains of office to the integrity and dedication of the individuals who seek public office. If politicians were to receive only a modest, reasonable salary, with no extravagant perks, it would not only help reduce unnecessary spending but also encourage individuals genuinely motivated by social service to enter politics. Politics would once again be seen as an honorable career driven by purpose rather than personal gain.

The Dangers of Privilege & the Potential for Abuse

The current system of perks can lead to widespread misuse of taxpayers' money. Free amenities, unchecked access to resources, and an inflated lifestyle create an environment ripe for corruption. With no financial constraint, a politician can easily indulge in luxurious comforts while the country faces issues like poverty, illiteracy, and unemployment. How can we expect those in power to understand the struggles of the common man when they live in such a starkly different reality? The very benefits they receive become tools for self-aggrandizement and a mechanism to hold onto power, rather than serving the public good.

Additionally, the sense of entitlement that comes with these perks can encourage self-interest rather than a focus on long-term welfare. Without financial constraints or accountability for the resources used, politicians may not feel the same urgency to address the nation's pressing challenges, prioritizing personal luxury over public service.

The Path Forward: Demystifying Politics

De-glamorizing politics would begin with a complete reassessment of the perks given to elected officials. If politicians were required to pay for their own travel, living expenses, and communication bills, they would experience the same financial realities as the citizens they serve. This policy would not only curb misuse of taxpayer funds but would also attract individuals who are truly passionate about social service, rather than those drawn to politics for personal gain or status.

Politicians should be elected based on their abilities, commitment, and willingness to serve — not because of the opportunities for lavish living they offer. When those in power live modestly, the message is clear: public service is about leadership, not luxury. The political landscape would be transformed, with genuine, dedicated leaders emerging from diverse backgrounds, with a true focus on the welfare of the nation rather than the enrichment of themselves.

Final Thoughts

Why should we accept a system that rewards those who already hold power with excess, while the common man bears the burden of their decisions? How long will we continue to tolerate a system that allows those in authority to live above their means, funded by the very people they should serve?

Shouldn’t we, as a nation, demand that our leaders live like the citizens they represent, and not as celebrities surrounded by luxury? The question remains: can we truly reimagine our political system by stripping away these privileges, and in doing so, restore the integrity and purpose of public office? Only time will tell.