Random Thoughts
	Regime Change Insanity & Blowbacks
		
	
	Doing the same thing again and again despite catastrophic outcomes is  		one of the definitions of insanity that Einstein used. The US has been  		an imperial power almost since its inception even though it masqueraded  		as a democratic republic. Desire for power, intolerance for British  		parliamentary subjugation, resentment of the deprived to restraint on  		usurpation of Indian lands by the British treaties and law, and  		treatment as yahoos by the British officials of the white American  		merchants and planters, were the main reasons for rebellion. Manifest  		Destiny and Monroe Doctrine were a form of expropriation and  		colonization no different from that of empire builders like Cecil  		Rhodes. The difference was that the Americans could not merge their ego  		with that of king and country and resented being treated as second class  		failures who migrated from Britain and lacked refinement and culture,  		the ruling class British officials believed was theirs.
By the end of the nineteenth century, the continent had been secured,  		the British thrown out of Oregon and Washington, the Spanish from  		California and half of Mexico expropriated and the US rapacious vision  		directed outwards. McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt turned their eyes to  		Cuba and used false pretexts to start the Spanish American War with the  		encouragement of media and sugar barons. When the resistance in Cuba and  		the Philippines sought independence, a form of occupation and regime  		change to install puppets began. It took decades before the puppet  		regimes of Batista in Cuba and Marcos in Philippines, the last in power  		under US supervision and exploitation were overthrown.
Woodrow Wilson indulged in regime change in Haiti, Mexico and other  		places. FDR had his SOB in Somoza of Nicaragua. Truman went for regime  		change in Korea, Eisenhower in Iran, Lebanon and Guatemala, Kennedy in  		Vietnam, Nixon in Cambodia and Laos, Carter in Afghanistan, Reagan in  		Granada and (failure) in Lebanon, Bush 41 in Panama, Clinton in Bosnia,  		Kosovo and Somalia, Bush 43 in Afghanistan, Iraq, Georgia, Ukraine,  		Kyrghyzstan, Pakistan. While earlier American manipulated regime changes  		lasted long enough to yield economic benefits of neo-colonial  		exploitation or political triumph for extended periods of time, the most  		recent Orange, Tulip and Pakistani regime changes have resulted in  		serious and rapid blowbacks of harmful nature within very short periods.
The arming of Afghan Mujahedeen by the US and Saudi Arabia led to the  		dissolution of the Soviet Union, but at the cost of spread of radical  		Islam and terrorism from Egypt to Indonesia. The radical Muslim allies  		morphed into terrorists of 9-11, London, Madrid, Bali and Mumbai. The US  		legitimately sought the downfall of the Soviets but after succeeding in  		Afghanistan aided its own capitalists and crooked Russian leaders and  		oligarchs to ruin the economy of Russia with the co-operation of a  		corrupt drink besotted leader like Yeltsin. Clinton reneged on his  		promise not to extend NATO into prior Soviet territory and pressured the  		EU to accept Georgia and Ukraine. The US and its institutions used money  		to overthrow Shevardnadze and replace him with a corrupt insane  		Sakashvili, who will fall sooner or later. In Ukraine they supported a  		president who was inept and corrupt by financing the orange revolution.  		Internal bickering between him and his prime minister Julia Tymoshenko  		has unraveled the revolution and now Ukraine is ready to revert back  		into the Russian fold after having had enough deprivation during its US  		inspired rekindling of resentment of Stalin’s genocide of Ukrainian  		kulaks. Ukraine’s economic problems and energy dependence on Russia and  		its intertwined geography, large Russian population, make it a natural  		ally of Russia. 
Kyrghyzstan like its sister Stans and other Soviet block countries like  		Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia was ruled by former communist leaders who  		now called themselves socialists or reformists. Many of them used their  		power to become obscenely rich after Soviet breakup. Askar Akiyev, the  		previous president was overthrown in the Tulip revolution orchestrated  		by the US under the pretext of installing democracy. They installed  		Bakiyev, a corrupt thug, by giving him bogus democratic credentials.  		Bakiyev extorted a larger rent for the Manas airbase which the US needed  		for logistical supply of troops in Afghanistan. He gave his son an  		exclusive monopoly to provision the base and be the intermediary for US  		purchases. 
The people were pushed into abject penury. He raised the prices for  		electricity and gasoline to enrich his cronies monopolizing their  		distribution. He sought the backing of Islamists and ordered his troops  		to shoot demonstrators. Hundreds died and were injured. The opposition  		protested and overthrew him. He sought refuge in the less Russified and  		more Islamic southern half of the country. This could lead to civil war  		and breakup of the country and worsening resurgence of already prominent  		Islamic radicals in the southern half of Kyrghyzstan which is in close  		proximity to Ferghana valley parts of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, where  		Islamic radicalism is based. It also makes the US more susceptible to  		blackmail by Pakistan and Taliban, which control the Khyber and Boland  		pass supply routes, the only other logistical channel for US troops in  		Afghanistan. Similar events in Pakistan led to overthrow of Musharraf  		after he served the US purpose. Benazir Bhutto was brought in to replace  		him. She was assassinated by the Taliban with active negligence by  		Musharraf and the army. Zardari was elected and sidelined by the US  		after he served to get rid of Musharraf and eventually Kiyani, the new  		army chief was anointed as the real leader to do the US bidding leaving  		Pakistan and its people destitute.
Insane regime change policies lead to serious blowbacks detrimental to  		US power and economic welfare. The most recent foolishness has led to  		Germany wiggling out of the tight US embrace and becoming friendlier  		with Russia and Japan doing the same while making up to China. Only  		foolish India and its dumb leaders keep doing US bidding to their own  		country’s detriment. It is like a serious and tragic formulaic Hindi  		movie with the comic opera being provided by the plantation owner US  		intermittently ravishing its buxom female slave Pakistan forcibly  		between bouts of whipping her, and Manmohan Singh’s India trying  		desperately to get into the bed for a menage a la trois with orgasmic  		fantasies of becoming a superpower, but getting kicked out by the  		frantic convulsions of the writhing torsos of the US and Pakistan. In  		the meantime the lady of the plantation, China, the trophy second wife,  		makes sure that the family wealth remains in safe custody for its  		children by the first marriage, while ignoring the insanity of the  		dominant spouse now powerless because of his sexual addiction and  		sadistic tendencies. I think I will watch Tiger Woods instead. 
	
	04-Apr-2010
	More by : 
		 Gaurang Bhatt, MD					
		
		
	 
	
		 Top  | Random Thoughts